For both sides
Interim management services agreements
Federal and state law current as of September 2026 — verify with counsel.
An interim management services agreement lets a cannabis buyer provide staff, systems and advice to the seller's licensed business while regulators review the ownership change. The seller must stay in real control, the fee must be a fair-market charge rather than a share of profit in most states, and the agreement usually has to be filed with or approved by the regulator. Undisclosed control has drawn six-figure fines.
Key takeaways
- New Jersey requires a management services agreement to be submitted to the Commission before execution, caps the term at five years, and bars it from granting any security or ownership interest (N.J.A.C. 17:30-6.9).
- In New York a service provider becomes a true party of interest if annual payments exceed the greatest of 10% of gross revenue, 50% of net profit, or $250,000.
- Washington treats anyone with a right to revenue, gross profit or net profit as a true party of interest; flat or hourly fees under a written contract are excluded.
- Massachusetts regulators fined Acreage Holdings $250,000 in 2020 and TILT Holdings $275,000 in 2021 over management and loan agreements that gave control of more licenses than the cap allows.
- Missouri requires management and consulting contracts to be filed with a 50%-plus change-of-ownership application, so the regulator reads the interim agreement alongside the purchase agreement.
What is an interim management services agreement?
It is a contract under which the buyer, or a buyer affiliate, provides services to the seller’s licensed business between signing and closing. Typical services are staffing support, purchasing, accounting, compliance, marketing and point-of-sale systems. The seller’s entity remains the licensee, keeps the bank account, and makes the decisions.
Buyers want one because a regulator’s review can take six months or more and a business can drift in that time. Sellers accept one because a buyer already invested in operations is less likely to walk. The risk is the same for both: if the agreement hands over control or profit, the state may treat it as an ownership change made without approval. Approval rules are covered on change of ownership approval explained.
How do states regulate management agreements?
| State | Rule | What it means for an interim MSA |
|---|---|---|
| New Jersey | N.J.A.C. 17:30-6.9: arms-length, fair-market terms; submitted to the Commission before execution; contractor supervised by the license holder; no security or ownership interest, though a right of first refusal is allowed; term of no more than five years without renegotiation; either side may terminate on notice | File first, then sign. Do not combine the MSA with a pledge or purchase option |
| New York | 9 NYCRR 124.3 and OCM guidance: a provider paid more than the greatest of 10% of gross revenue, 50% of net profit or $250,000 in a calendar year is a true party of interest | Keep the fee under the thresholds or be vetted as an interest holder |
| Washington | WAC 314-55-035: any right to revenue, gross profit or net profit makes a true party of interest; flat or hourly pay under a written contract does not | Flat fee only until the Board approves the buyer |
| Missouri | 19 CSR 100-1.100: brand, management and consultant contracts must be included with a 50%-plus ownership-change application | The MSA is read as part of the deal |
| California | 4 CCR 15023 and the owner definition: anyone who manages, directs or controls the business is an owner and must be disclosed | A manager with real authority is an owner, whatever the contract calls it |
The definitions behind this table are explained on true party of interest and financial interest rules.
What has enforcement looked like?
Massachusetts is the best-documented example. State law limits how many licenses one person or entity may control, and the Cannabis Control Commission looked at whether management contracts and loans gave larger companies control of nominally independent license holders.
- In July 2020 the Commission fined Acreage Holdings $250,000 over management services arrangements that the Globe reported were an attempt to exceed the license cap. Acreage terminated the agreements.
- In June 2021 TILT Holdings paid $275,000. The settlement acknowledged the Commission could find TILT should have known it had direct or indirect control of five medical licenses against a cap of three.
The Commission may assess up to $50,000 per violation, and suspension or revocation is available for serious cases. Both matters involved long-term arrangements, not interim ones, but the test is identical. Regulators look at who decides and who profits, not at the title of the document.
A disclosed example
Ascend Wellness Holdings’ fiscal 2025 annual report describes two Midwest dispensary purchases signed in 2025. In each, the parties signed the purchase agreement and a management services agreement together. The MSA paid a set fee, took effect only after the regulator approved it, and stays in place until the ownership change itself is approved and closes. Half of the cash price, $833,000 in one deal and $1,667,000 in the other, was paid when the MSA was approved, with the balance due at final closing. That is the compliant pattern: fixed fee, regulator sign-off first, and an end date tied to closing.
Permitted and prohibited terms
| Usually acceptable | Usually a problem |
|---|---|
| Flat monthly fee or cost plus a fixed margin, at fair market value | Fee equal to all or most of net profit |
| Manager recommends; licensee’s owners decide | Manager may overrule owners on budgets, hiring of key staff, or pricing |
| Licensee keeps bank accounts and signs checks | Manager sweeps cash or controls the account |
| Manager’s staff hold their own badges and work under licensee procedures | Unbadged buyer personnel on the floor |
| Either party may terminate on notice; automatic end if the sale fails | Irrevocable term or penalties that make termination impractical |
| Licensee owns inventory and track-and-trace records | Manager takes title to product |
| Disclosed to the regulator | Side letter not filed with the application |
Staff credentials are their own subject; see employee transfer and agent badges.
How should the fee work?
Set a fee that an unrelated service company would charge, document how it was calculated, and keep it clear of the state’s profit-share tests.
Illustrative. A New York dispensary has $4,000,000 of annual gross revenue and $500,000 of net profit. The three tests are 10% of revenue ($400,000), 50% of net profit ($250,000), and $250,000. The threshold is the greatest of the three, $400,000. A flat interim fee of $20,000 a month annualizes to $240,000, which is below it. A fee of 12% of revenue would be $480,000, which is above it and would make the manager a true party of interest before the state has approved it as an owner.
The buyer’s real reward for improving the business during the wait should come through the purchase agreement instead: a working-capital adjustment at closing, or a price that was fixed at signing so that improvements accrue to the buyer once it owns the company.
Checklist for an interim MSA
- Confirm whether the state requires filing or pre-approval, and do that before any services begin.
- Define services narrowly. List what the manager does not do: sign for the licensee, hire or fire principals, move cash.
- State that the licensee’s owners retain final authority and supervise the manager.
- Use a flat or cost-plus fee and keep the supporting calculation.
- Require compliance with the licensee’s standard operating procedures and track-and-trace rules.
- Give the manager read-only system access unless its people are badged and approved for more.
- Add a manager indemnity for violations it causes, and insurance naming the licensee.
- Make the term end at closing, on termination of the purchase agreement, or on regulator objection.
- Cross-refer to the ordinary-course covenants in the purchase agreement so the two documents do not conflict.
- Attach the MSA to the change-of-ownership filing where the state asks for related agreements.
When should you skip the MSA?
Often. If the seller’s team is capable and the review is expected to take a few months, information rights and ordinary-course covenants in the purchase agreement achieve most of what a buyer needs with none of the regulatory risk. Those covenants are described on regulatory-approval contingencies. An MSA earns its place when the seller is disengaged, the business is in distress, or key staff will leave without visible new leadership. In a receivership, the receiver’s court order, not an MSA, usually governs who operates; see cannabis receivership sales explained.
After closing, the direction of services reverses and the seller helps the buyer. That is covered on transition period and owner training. This page is general education, not legal advice.
Frequently asked questions
Can the buyer keep the profits under an interim management agreement?
Generally no. A right to profits is what most states use to identify an owner. Washington counts any right to revenue or net profit as a true-party interest, and New York applies a 10 percent of revenue, 50 percent of profit, or 250,000 dollar threshold. The safer design is a flat or cost-plus fee, with the economics of the waiting period handled through the purchase price adjustment.
Does the regulator have to approve the management agreement?
It depends on the state. New Jersey requires submission before the agreement is signed and issues a decision. Missouri requires management contracts to accompany a major ownership-change application. New York reserves the right to review any licensee agreement. Even where no filing rule exists, the buyer's approval application is a poor moment for the state to discover an agreement it was never shown.
Who is liable for a compliance violation while the buyer is managing?
The licensee, which is still the seller's entity. Regulators cite the license holder regardless of who was running the shift. The agreement should therefore give the seller real supervision rights, require the manager to follow the seller's approved operating procedures, and include an indemnity from the manager for violations it causes, backed by the deposit or another source of recovery.
What happens to the management agreement if the sale is not approved?
It should end automatically, with a short wind-down. Draft for that day: return of records and system credentials, reassignment of staff, settlement of fees and advances, and a clear statement that the manager acquires no interest in the license, inventory or goodwill. New Jersey requires that either party be able to terminate on due notice in any case.
Can a management agreement be used instead of buying the business?
Not as a substitute for ownership approval. Long-term agreements that pass control and profit to a manager are what regulators call hidden ownership, and they were the subject of the Massachusetts fines against Acreage and TILT. Legitimate long-term service contracts exist, but they leave decisions and profit with the licensed owners and are disclosed.
Sources
- New Jersey Administrative Code — N.J.A.C. 17:30-6.9, Management services agreements (Cornell LII) — https://www.law.cornell.edu/regulations/new-jersey/N-J-A-C-17-30-6-9
- New York Codes, Rules and Regulations — 9 NYCRR 124.3, Goods and Services Agreements (Cornell LII) — https://www.law.cornell.edu/regulations/new-york/9-NYCRR-124.3
- New York Office of Cannabis Management — Guidance for True Parties of Interest (29 Sep 2023) — https://cannabis.ny.gov/system/files/documents/2023/09/tpi-guidance-and-faq-for-retailers_0.pdf
- Washington Administrative Code — WAC 314-55-035, Qualifying for a cannabis license — https://app.leg.wa.gov/wac/default.aspx?cite=314-55-035
- Missouri Code of State Regulations — 19 CSR 100-1.100 (Cornell LII) — https://www.law.cornell.edu/regulations/missouri/19-CSR-100-1-100
- The Boston Globe — Mass. marijuana regulators fine Acreage Holdings $250,000 for attempting to exceed license cap (9 Jul 2020) — https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/07/09/marijuana/mass-marijuana-regulators-fine-acreage-holdings-250000-attempting-exceed-license-cap/
- The Boston Globe — Massachusetts regulators fine marijuana firm TILT Holdings $275,000 over license scheme (17 Jun 2021) — https://www.bostonglobe.com/2021/06/17/marijuana/massachusetts-regulators-fine-marijuana-firm-tilt-holdings-275000-over-license-scheme/
- Massachusetts Cannabis Control Commission — Investigations and Enforcement — https://masscannabiscontrol.com/investigations-and-enforcement/
- SEC EDGAR — Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc., Annual Report for fiscal 2025 (Form ARS) — https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1756390/000110465926032733/tm268562d1_ars.pdf
- California Code of Regulations — 4 CCR 15023, Business Modifications (Cornell LII) — https://www.law.cornell.edu/regulations/california/4-CCR-15023