For both sides

True party of interest and financial interest rules

Federal and state law current as of September 2026 — verify with counsel.

True party of interest and financial interest rules define who a cannabis regulator treats as an owner, even without equity. They reach lenders, landlords, consultants and spouses whose pay or rights track profits or control. Thresholds differ: Illinois vets owners above 1%, California discloses anyone with a loan or 10% of profits, and New York tests revenue-share contracts.

Key takeaways

  • Washington treats anyone who receives a share of revenue or profits, or exercises control, as a true party of interest; a new financier needs prior Board approval.
  • New York deems a contractor a true party of interest if paid more than the greater of 10% of gross revenue, 50% of net profit, or $250,000 in a year.
  • California defines an owner at 20% aggregate equity and a financial interest holder as anyone with a smaller stake, a loan, or 10% or more of profits.
  • Illinois defines a principal officer to include owners above 1% of a private company and anyone with a profit-sharing or revenue-sharing arrangement.
  • Colorado requires disclosure of an indirect financial interest holder who provides debt exceeding 50% of operating capital.

What these rules are for

Regulators want to know who really owns, controls and profits from each license. The rules stop hidden owners, enforce license caps and residency rules, and keep disqualified people out. The labels differ by state: true party of interest in Washington and New York, financial interest holder in California, controlling and passive beneficial owner in Colorado, principal officer in Illinois. The logic is the same. If your money, pay or rights rise and fall with the licensed business, expect to be disclosed, and possibly vetted.

For a sale, this matters because the buyer’s whole capital stack is reviewed, not just the named purchaser. This page is educational and is not legal advice.

Three tests regulators apply

  1. Equity. Any ownership above a set percentage, counted directly and through holding entities.
  2. Economics. A right to revenue, profit, or a percentage-based fee, whatever the contract is called.
  3. Control. Power to manage, veto, appoint officers or direct operations.

Failing any one test is enough. A lender with no equity can still be a party of interest through profit participation or covenants that amount to control.

State definitions compared

StateTermWho is caughtNotable exclusionsSource
WashingtonTrue party of interest; financierOwners, partners, LLC members and managers, officers, directors, stockholders, and anyone receiving revenue or profits or exercising control. Financiers need prior approval.Fixed-rate landlords, flat-fee consultants, employees on commission of 10% of sales or less, business sale brokers, banksWAC 314-55-035
New YorkTrue party of interest; passive investorOwners, plus third parties paid more than the greater of 10% of gross revenue, 50% of net profit, or $250,000 in a calendar yearPassive investors with no control holding up to 5% of a public licensee, 10% of a private retail or microbusiness licensee, or 20% of other entities still count as parties of interest but are vetted more lightly9 NYCRR 118.1
CaliforniaOwner; financial interest holderOwner: 20% aggregate or anyone who manages, directs or controls. Financial interest holder: smaller stakes, any lender, anyone entitled to 10% or more of profitsBanks, diversified funds and blind trusts, holders of only a lien or security interest, shareholders under 10%4 CCR 15003; 15004
ColoradoControlling beneficial owner; passive beneficial owner; indirect financial interest holderAll controlling beneficial owners; 10% holders within owner entities; a person with two or more indirect financial interests, or debt financing above 50% of operating capitalPassive owners are disclosed only on reasonable cause, but the business must collect their affirmationsRule 2-230
IllinoisPrincipal officer; financial interestBoard members, officers, members, managers, owners above 1% (above 5% for a public company), anyone with a profit-sharing, financial-interest or revenue-sharing arrangement, anyone with control or who assumes the debtsPublic-company stock of 5% or less in aggregate with spouse, parent and childIDFPR guidance
MarylandOwner; control; passive investorAny direct or indirect equity; control includes veto rights, power to appoint officers, and authority over contracts of $10,000 or more in aggregatePassive investor: under 5% in aggregate and no controlMCA guidance
New JerseyOwner; passive investor; financial source; management services contractorOwners limited to one license holder; a financial source may fund up to 7 license holders; a management contractor may serve up to 5Passive investors may hold interests in more than one businessN.J.A.C. 17:30-6.8

New York’s Office of Cannabis Management keeps guidance and forms on its True Parties of Interest hub. The rules there also enforce the state’s separation between supply-side and retail licenses, which is why a small interest on the wrong side of that line can block a deal.

Financial interest disclosure: what gets filed

A disclosure package normally contains:

  • An ownership chart down to natural persons, with percentages. Colorado asks for an organizational chart of all controlling beneficial owners; Illinois asks for every person and entity regardless of whether they meet the principal officer test.
  • Loan agreements, notes, guaranties and security documents.
  • Management, consulting, licensing and services agreements, with the fee formula.
  • Leases, especially any with percentage rent.
  • Trust documents naming trustees and beneficiaries, and fund documents showing who directs the fund.
  • For public companies, holders above 5% from SEC filings, and in Colorado a twice-yearly screen of holders against sanctions and securities databases.

Illinois sums up the standard in one line of statute: a dispensing organization “shall not shield its ownership or control” from the department.

Where deals go wrong

Seller notes with upside. A fixed-rate seller note makes the seller a disclosed lender. Add an equity kicker, a revenue share or step-in management rights and the seller may still be an owner in the regulator’s eyes after closing. See seller financing in cannabis deals.

Earn-outs. A payment calculated on post-closing profit can look like a continuing profit interest. Some states accept it as deferred price if disclosed; structure and wording matter. See earn-outs in cannabis deals.

Management and brand agreements. Percentage fees are the trigger. In New York, a fee above the greater of 10% of gross revenue, 50% of net profit or $250,000 makes the contractor a true party of interest. See interim management services agreements.

Investor protections. Standard private-equity veto rights, board seats and spending approvals meet Maryland’s definition of control. An investor who wanted to stay passive can become a controlling party, and then count against ownership caps.

Private capital. Funds and family offices must usually disclose their own principals. See family-office and private-investor capital.

Illustrative. A New York retailer has gross revenue of $3,000,000 and net profit of $300,000. Ten percent of gross is $300,000; 50% of net is $150,000; the fixed figure is $250,000. The threshold is the greatest of the three, $300,000. A consultant paid $320,000 in the year is deemed a true party of interest and must qualify as one.

A pre-LOI checklist for buyers and sellers

  1. List every person and entity with equity, debt, a percentage-based contract, or approval rights, on both sides of the deal.
  2. Classify each under the state’s definitions, using the rule text.
  3. Check each against license caps, cross-tier limits and residency rules.
  4. Identify which need prior approval and add them to the change of ownership application.
  5. Rewrite any term that creates an unintended party of interest, such as converting a percentage fee to a flat fee.
  6. Disclose the rest. Undisclosed interests are far more damaging than disclosed ones.

Frequently asked questions

Does a seller who carries a note become a financial interest holder?

Often yes. California treats anyone who lends to a commercial cannabis business as a financial interest holder unless the lender is a bank or financial institution, so a seller carrying a note must be disclosed. Washington treats a non-bank lender as a financier who needs prior Board approval. A fixed-rate note is disclosable; a note with profit participation can make the seller an owner.

Is a landlord a true party of interest?

Not if the rent is fixed. Washington excludes landlords charging a fixed rate unless there is common ownership. California treats a landlord as a financial interest holder if it receives 10% or more of profits. Percentage rent tied to cannabis sales is the usual way a landlord crosses the line, so check the lease before assuming it is neutral.

Are spouses of cannabis owners vetted?

In some states. Washington counts a married couple together for license limits and requires licensees to report changes in marital status of any true party of interest. Illinois defines financial interest to include interests held through a spouse, parent or child. A buyer should expect to disclose spouse information in those states.

How small a stake avoids disclosure?

There is rarely a safe percentage. California exempts shareholders under 10% only from financial-interest-holder treatment, and Illinois exempts public-company stock of 5% or less. Maryland treats holders under 5% with no control as passive investors. But any stake combined with control rights, profit shares or management authority will normally bring the holder back into review.

What is the difference between an owner and a financial interest holder in California?

An owner holds 20% or more in aggregate or manages, directs or controls the business, and must submit personal history and fingerprints. A financial interest holder has a smaller stake, a loan, or a right to 10% or more of profits and is disclosed by name but not vetted as an owner. Misclassifying an owner as a financial interest holder is a disclosure violation.

Sources

  1. Washington Administrative Code — WAC 314-55-035 — https://www.law.cornell.edu/regulations/washington/WAC-314-55-035
  2. Washington Administrative Code — WAC 314-55-120, Ownership changes — https://www.law.cornell.edu/regulations/washington/WAC-314-55-120
  3. New York Codes, Rules and Regulations — 9 NYCRR 118.1, Definitions — https://www.law.cornell.edu/regulations/new-york/9-NYCRR-118.1
  4. New York Office of Cannabis Management — True Parties of Interest Hub — https://cannabis.ny.gov/tpi-hub
  5. California Code of Regulations — 4 CCR 15003, Owners — https://www.law.cornell.edu/regulations/california/4-CCR-15003
  6. California Code of Regulations — 4 CCR 15004, Financial Interest — https://www.law.cornell.edu/regulations/california/4-CCR-15004
  7. Code of Colorado Regulations — 1 CCR 212-3, Rule 2-230 — https://www.law.cornell.edu/regulations/colorado/1-CCR-212-3-2-230
  8. Illinois DFPR — Change of Ownership Guidance (7 Feb 2023) — https://idfpr.illinois.gov/content/dam/soi/en/web/idfpr/forms/auc/2023-2-7-change-of-ownership-guidance.pdf
  9. Maryland Cannabis Administration — Transfer of Ownership, All Licensees guidance (2023, archived) — https://cannabis.maryland.gov/Documents/2023%20_PDF_Files/Laws%20and%20Regulations/Transfer%20of%20Ownership,%20All%20Licensees.pdf
  10. New Jersey Administrative Code — N.J.A.C. 17:30-6.8 — https://www.law.cornell.edu/regulations/new-jersey/N-J-A-C-17-30-6-8